|
Project 2008-12
Coordinate Interchange Standards
Related Files
Status:
The SDT is reviewing the comments received on its
5 initial draft standards.
Purpose/Industry Need:
There is confusion regarding the Interchange Authority “function.”
The need for improved clarity became apparent when entities were
recently asked to register in the Compliance Registry as “Interchange
Authorities” and entities had difficulty determining which entities were
performing the Interchange Authority tasks identified in the set of
Coordinate Interchange standards.
The Interchange Authority activities in the Coordinate
Interchange standards are performed by software systems and not a
responsible entity. The
software, not a functional entity, performs the task of accepting and
disseminating interchange data between entities.
The Coordinate Interchange standards dealing with
the Interchange Authority and the current Functional Model
representations of the Interchange Authority do not reflect
technological advances made since the Functional Model working group
originally defined the Interchange Authority and advances made since the
Coordinate Interchange standards were written.
The modifications in
the set of Coordinate Interchange Standards should address the
following:
-
Determine if the
activities in the Coordinate Interchange standards correctly
identify the responsible entity.
-
Consider requiring the Sink Balancing Authority responsibility for
Interchange Authority functions, using an interchange transaction
tool process as defined in the latest approved version of the e-Tag
Specifications.
-
The existing requirements are tool-neutral ― consider adding
specific references to the e-Tagging process in the requirements
-
Consider adding a
requirement to have backup capability for use when the interchange
transaction tool fails.
-
Consider
combining requirements into a fewer number of standards so that the
resultant set of requirements follows a chronological sequence that
is easier to follow.
-
Address the directives issued by FERC in Order 693,
and the stakeholder comments from the V0 drafting team and the
Violation Risk Factors Drafting Team.
-
Determine if there is industry-wide support for the
Interchange Subcommittee’s Principles and definition supporting
dynamic transfers and pseudo-ties, and if there is support, modify
the requirements and add definitions accordingly.
|
All comments should be forwarded to
sarcomm@nerc.net. |